Wednesday, February 22, 2012

Food = Environmental hazards



What are food miles ? They are the miles your food travel from start to finish, from prosuction to consumption, from field to plate. So many people passively buy food from their grocery store without much consideration from where it has come from. Have you ever considered that when you buy your weekly bunch of bananas they have been shipped from Guatemala ? Globalization has caused an increase to food miles. Connor Steve, author of Buy Local Produce and Save the World said, ”The environmental cost of food transport is given as US 3.8 billion dollars a year, and it is claimed that it in-creased by 12% in the period between 1992 and 2002.” He also said, “If all of the U.K. food came from within 20 km of where we live, we could save £2.1 billion a year in environmental and congestion costs.”



Two word can be said about food and its massive transportation industry : Greenhouse gases. Our desire for whatever food we want all year long is causing harm to our environment. Eating locally would cause these CO2 emissions to decrease.

The NYTimes said, “Food is traveling because transport has become so cheap in a world of globalization,” said Frederic Hauge, head of Norway’s environmental group Bellona. “If it was just a matter of processing fish cheaper in China, I’d be happy with it traveling there. The problem is pollution.” Previously, there have been no taxes on the transportation of food, but countries specifically in the European Union are starting to force the cost of pollution on countries taxing transportation.

Transportation is not the only issue causing an increase to fossil fuel emissions. Production is also another problem. Studies show that in some cases, the transportation of goods has a lower carbon footprint then those produced locally.

Another problem is also due to the increase of humans eating meat. The FAO records that farm animals account for between 20% and 30% of global greenhouse gas emissions. This number accounts for the deforestation for grazing lands.



So how do we improve this problem ? Christopher Weber and H. Scott Matthews of Carnegie Mellon University said that adopting a vegetarian diet would reduce emissions more than if we became localivores. But this debate on what should this populated earth eat continues still. Nevertheless, we should consider our food miles and how our demand for certain foods affect the environment.

-MAU

1 comment:

  1. There is a growing movement within the U.S. to support local farmers, which, if it garners more support, I believe will reduce much of this problem. By choosing to shop at a farmer's market people not only cut down on their own carbon footprints, but are supporting their local economies. If that's not enough of a reason, produce at such markets are also generally not genetically tampered with and are guaranteed to be fresh if coming from a closer proximity.

    I think a lot of the problem with this is cost, however, as we've been learning in class. Produce from major corporations are cheaper because of their mass production thus leading to the failure of small farms all over the country for their lack of ability to compete with such prices. With only a handful of big companies monopolizing the entire market it leaves little room for small farmers to be as conveniently available. That said, I think that the U.S. should evaluate these problems and more effectively address them in its policy-making.

    -Dana

    ReplyDelete